Compare and contrast

The Left argue that the BBC / Nu Labour alliance TV poll tax is essential, otherwise we would just get commercial rubbish, such as the terribly lowbrow, pro-Bush Fox News.

 

Reet then. Here is the completely unbiased, tax funded BBC / Nu Labour alliance interviewing Dave. Here is the horrid free market funded ‘pro Bush, lowbrow’ Fox interviewing Ron Paul (who is no Bush fan).

Now, you can see an obvious, and admitted bias in the Fox interview, whereas the BBC bias is just as obvious, yet not admitted. Now be honest ~ which piece of programming informed you the most about a politicians position, which was the least lowbrow?

 

Time to abandon Auntie.

2 Responses to “Compare and contrast”

  1. The Today Programme’s John Humphreys interviewed Fat Gordie and gave him a benign run so that he prattled on and on and came out with all the old mantras blaming the USA, Conservatives and Global issues for all his troubles.
    It was so orchestrated and in direct contrast with the terrier like harrasment in Cameron interview (on this blog) that I immediately complained to the BBC.
    Brown is sounding more like that Welsh Windbag Kinnock in a different key every day.
    Listen to today’s John Humphreys apology for an interview and complain to the BBC today.

  2. For all its faults fox does give airtime to opposing views…something the beeb rarely does.The Beebs version of giving the right airtime usually consists of the tamest conservative they can round up.

Leave a Reply